Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 5 Next »


RRSDA

1999-019 – Renewal, Tenure, Promotion and Salary Review Files

Retention

CY final decision concluded + 1 year

Candidate

 

Year

 


Documents Retained in Personnel File (see RRSDA 1996-004)

See Retention Fund procedures, approved by the VP Academic, April 2002.  http://www.academicrelations.sfu.ca/documents/RetentionAwardGuidelines.pdf


Documents Retained in Personnel File

Document Type

Office of Responsibility (for viewing)

Letter from Vice-President Academic with final decision (July 1)



Dean's Recommendation Letter for retention award (May 1)

TPC's Recommendation Letter for retention award (March 1)

Additional information from Faculty member in response to any recommendation



Letter from TPC Chair regarding materials and timeline (January 15)



Initial application/nomination letter from the Dean or faculty member for retention award (December 15)



Any appeal documentation



Retention award start date Email 

Faculty member continued to receive retention award despite it expiring. Start date changed to not trigger retroactive payments



Destruction

                                                                                     

 

Documents Destroyed at end of Retention Period

Includes working records with no further administrative value after case review.  Keep these documents in a separate/complete file (with copies of documents listed above that will be retained) with a destruction date clearly noted on file.

  1. Statements of research, teaching and service
  2. Curriculum Vitae
  3. Publications, research in progress
  4. Teaching evaluation summary
  5. Other information as requested by the TPC or provided by the candidate
  6. Information from other nominees/unsuccessful candidates

Notes

  • No RRSDA specifically mentions Retention Fund Awards – used 1999-019 as the information collected is similar – okay as per Paul Hebbard – Records Management (October 4, 2007)
  • The TPC may request additional information if they feel it is necessary for making a recommendation
  • No labels