Salary Review documents should be subdivided by year, with the most recent year on top. For example
Salary Review 2020
...
RRSDA
...
Retention
...
Name
...
...
Year
...
Documents Retained in Personnel File
...
Background
TBC
Authorities
TBC
RRSDA's
Personnel Files
Documents for Review
Documents *Mandatory | Document Retention | Required? | Document Type in eTRACS | Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) i.e. decision maker in the process | Access ie. Faculty Department level, Faculty Dean's office level, everyone at Dean's office level outside own faculty | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Retention Period | RRSDA | |||||
Salary review package may include letter, CV for past 2 years, teaching dossier/philosophy |
Salary Review Package | ||||||
Director's Recommendation Letter assume Copy of recommendation to faculty member is the same document | Recommendation Letter for Salary Review | |||||
Dean's Recommendation Letter assume Copy of recommendation to faculty member is the same document | Recommendation Letter for Salary Review | |||||
Salary Review Step Acceptance Letter | Salary Review Step Acceptance Letter | |||||
Salary Review Appeal documents | Salary Review Appeal | |||||
Faculty Annual Salary Report |
Destruction
...
Faculty Annual Salary Report | ||||||
Faculty/Department Level Documents | ||||||
Electronic Folders & File Naming Conventions
The electronic folder can be labelled as the sample below:
2019-2020
2017-2018
2015-2016
(TBC)
File Naming Convention
Lastname_Firstname_ApptType_DocType_Dept/Faculty_YYYYMMDD
e.g. Doe_John_ASP_CV_Beedie_20210714
Business Cases for Document Retention
(TBD - to discuss with FERM Working Group - note for reviewers, post your business cases in this section as to rationale for retaining documents and a length of time to keep them if known)
Working Group Questions
Questions to be explored when reviewing the document checklists:
Access Control Questions
Retention Questions
Office of Primary Responsibility
File Managers/Responsibility of Records