Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Background

TBC

Authorities

TBC

RRSDA

...

1999-019 – Renewal, Tenure, Promotion and Salary Review Files

...

Retention

...

CY final decision concluded + 1 year

...

Candidate

...

 

...

Year

...

 

Documents Retained in Personnel File (see RRSDA 1996-004)

...

's

Personnel Files


Documents for Review

Documents 

*Mandatory
Document RetentionRequired?Document Type in eTRACS

Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR)

i.e. decision maker in the process

Access 

ie. Faculty Department level, Faculty Dean's office level, everyone at Dean's office  level outside own faculty
Total Retention PeriodRRSDA

Letter from Vice-President Academic with final decision (July 1)

...

April 15?




Final Decision of Retention Award



Dean's Recommendation Letter for retention award (May 1)


Recommendation Letter for Retention Award



TPC

...

's Recommendation Letter for retention award (March 1)


Recommendation Letter for Retention Award



Additional information from Faculty member in response to any recommendation




Additional Information response to any recommendation



Letter from TPC Chair regarding materials and timeline (January 15)




Materials and timeline notifications



Initial application/nomination letter from the Dean or faculty member for retention award (December 15)




Application or Nomination for Retention Award



Any appeal documentation

Destruction

                                                                                     

 

Documents Destroyed at end of Retention Period

...




Any Appeal Documentation



Retention award start date Email 

Faculty member continued to receive retention award despite it expiring. Start date changed to not trigger retroactive payments




Retention Award Start Date Confirmation Email



Statements of research, teaching and service


Research and Teaching Statements



Curriculum Vitae


CV



Publications, research in progress


Publications or Research in Progress



Teaching evaluation summary


Summary of Teaching Information



Other information as requested by the TPC or provided by the candidate


Supplementary Information



Information from other nominees/unsuccessful candidates


Information of other nominees or unsuccessful candidates










Faculty/Department Level Documents





















Electronic Folders & File Naming Conventions

The electronic folder can be labelled as the sample below:

Image Added 2019-2020 

(TBC)



File Naming Convention

Lastname_Firstname_ApptType_DocType_Dept/Faculty_YYYYMMDD

e.g. Doe_John_ASP_CV_Beedie_20210714


Business Cases for Document Retention

(TBD - to discuss with FERM Working Group - note for reviewers, post your business cases in this section as to rationale for retaining documents and a length of time to keep them if known)


Working Group Questions

Questions to be explored when reviewing the document checklists:



Access Control Questions



Retention Questions



Office of Primary Responsibility



File Managers/Responsibility of Records



Notes

  • No RRSDA specifically mentions Retention Fund Awards – used 1999-019 as the information collected is similar – okay as per Paul Hebbard – Records Management (October 4, 2007)
  • The TPC may request additional information if they feel it is necessary for making a recommendation